Fatherhood is shrinking in significance. I’m not just talking about physical absence — a third of American kids now live without their biological fathers — I’m talking about perceived importance. More and more, fathers are being viewed as less than necessary.
A 2016 study concluded that children of lesbian parents fared just as well — if not better — than those from a traditional man-woman marriage. A 2013 book stated “the notion that fathering is essential to children’s … development seems to be a uniquely American preoccupation.”
And take this recent exchange on “The View,” an ABC show with a massive female audience from 2013. A guest host, an actor named Terry Crews, had floated the idea that “there are some things only a father can give you.” He was deluged by objection — both on social media and on the set.
When he said, “A father gives you your name,” cohost Whoopi Goldberg joked, “Like in ‘The Lion King?’ ” When he said “a father gives you your security” and “your confidence,” Jenny McCarthy, who is raising a son on her own, shot back, “I’m a single mother and I guarantee you, I can give (my son) all those things.”
The debate went on for several minutes at a high volume, with the female hosts paying homage to widows, single moms and gay couples, and McCarthy hammering at the idea that her “amazing” son needs no man.
And while I know the show is not scientific, it’s entertainment, it still got me thinking how far we have come, that on network TV, a man suggesting “there are some things only a father can give you” is greeted not with agreeing nods but with cannon fire.
On some levels, we men must blame ourselves. The number of fathers who take no responsibility for parenting — who impregnate and run as if they are pollinating flowers — is despicably high. Same goes for disinterested divorced men and deadbeat dads. They have forced single mothers into playing all roles.
But what about the fathers who stay? The fathers who relish their roles? Is citing their virtues now politically incorrect?
Take the sentence “there are some things only a mother can provide.” Does anyone disagree with that? You say “nurturing,” everyone nods. You say “unconditional love,” everyone nods.
But try saying that sentence about a father — as Crews did — and it’s as if you’re hammering people’s toes. “A father provides security,” you suggest? Oh come on, comes the response, as if a woman can’t? “A father provides discipline”? Don’t single moms keep kids in line? “A father provides a male role model.” So now you’re insulting gay couples?
Whew. When did it become so difficult to extol fatherhood? Perhaps when there became other agendas. An author of that 2010 study on lesbian parenting, for example, also has argued there is no need for marriage whatsoever. She also chided President Barack Obama, saying his emphasis on fathers’ importance was “dead wrong.” Even the New York Times, for Father’s Day in 2013, stirred debate — and presumably readers — by asking, “Do fathers bring anything unique to the table?”
But if they don’t, why does nearly every statistic on kids turn sour when fathers disappear? Youth suicides, five times higher than average. High school dropouts, nine times higher. Behavioral disorders, 20 times higher. Runaways and homeless children, 32 times higher.
Does none of that count?
We all recognize it’s a changing world. And I would not use this space to disparage single parents, or two men or two women raising children. But if it’s now insensitive to even question gay parenting, why does it ruffle no feathers to dismiss heterosexual dads? No one should be made to feel a traditional role is prehistoric thinking. That’s bullying of its own kind.
Fatherhood didn’t suddenly, after thousands of years, lose its value. It may be trendy to dismiss dads as little more than fertilizer, but it’s not true. In fact, it’s pretty foolish. Such is our world, where a comment like Crews’ brings a tsunami.


from one Jesuit named Gerry Cuddy. While my uncle was alive, he spoke of this Jesuit as being one of the best teachers he had. The report cards bear this out. He received ‘second honors’ during the year that Mr. Cuddy, then a Jesuit Scholastic, was his home room teacher. The report cards then take an ominous turn when, in the following year, he found himself in academic trouble. ‘You son is in danger of failing the following subjects; Latin Composition, Latin Lit, Mathematics. He will need to take remedial examinations in the above checked subjects in order to continue at Xavier’, another saved letter stated. The Jesuits charged 5.00 for each examination and my uncle kept the receipt for these tests, as well. Like a detective, I tried to understand what happened. As I reviewed each card, I saw him standing in from of his parents asking them to sign these report cards and they did. My grandparent’s signatures are on each card under the red circled grades. The shame must have been overwhelming. John was asked to leave Xavier going into his senior year; yet he kept those cards and letters from Gerry Cuddy. Last night, I decided to find out more about who this Jesuit was and, because of the internet, I found myself corresponding with a present day Jesuit, Francis X. Hezel, who worked with Father Cuddy in Micronesia. Father Hezel, thanked me for reaching out and promised to share some insight into who Gerry Cuddy was with me. He sent me the attached photos of Father Cuddy. What kind of man was he that made my uncle save every small piece of correspondence sent from him? When I think of the Jesuits I had, I can recite a number of them who had profound impact on my life. Duminuco, Aracich, Keenan, Biaggi, Hoefner, Wood are Jesuits who helped me in my own life. Fourteen, fifteen, sixteen, seventeen, lemme tell you. Those are big years. Everybody always thinks of it as a time of adolescence—just getting through to the real part of your life—but it’s more than that. Sometimes your whole life happens in those years, and the rest of your life is just the same story playing out with different characters. I’m eternally grateful for going through those years with these Jesuits and I’m grateful that my uncle had, even for a brief time, Gerry Cuddy. A teacher, wrote Henry Adams, attains a kind of immortality because one never knows where a teacher’s influence ends. I hope that Father Hezel shares with me some stories of who Gerry Cuddy was. His influence on my uncle’s life was unquestionable and I thank him for that.