Standing for Americans Shouldn’t Be Controversial

Tonight, in a chamber built to represent the American people, a simple request was made.

When Donald Trump asked members of Congress to stand if they support American citizens over illegal aliens, it should not have been a complicated moment. It should not have required parsing. It should not have triggered strategic hesitation.

And yet, many chose to remain seated.

This wasn’t a vote on deportation policy. It wasn’t an endorsement of a specific border bill. It wasn’t even a partisan roll call. It was a symbolic affirmation that the interests of American citizens come first in the halls of their own government.

Standing for that principle should not be controversial.

Lawmakers who stayed seated will argue they were rejecting the framing. They’ll say the question was designed as a political trap. Perhaps it was. Politics is full of traps. But leadership sometimes requires stepping over the trap instead of freezing in it.

Because to families watching from kitchen tables — to veterans, small-business owners, parents struggling with rising costs — the moment didn’t look like a nuanced protest against rhetorical structure. It looked like hesitation to visibly affirm who government is supposed to prioritize.

You can support legal immigration.

You can advocate for reform.

You can debate enforcement levels.

But when asked whether American citizens come first — in America — standing should not be controversial.

In a year where trust in institutions is fragile and voters are measuring who hears them and who doesn’t, symbolism carries weight. Images linger. And tonight, the image was unmistakable.

Some rose.

Some didn’t.

Published by Ed Kowalski

Ed Kowalski is a Pleasant Valley resident, media voice, and policy-focused professional whose work sits at the intersection of law, public policy, and community life. Ed has spent his career working in senior leadership roles across human resources, compliance, and operations, helping organizations navigate complex legal and regulatory environments. His work has focused on accountability, risk management, workforce issues, and translating policy and law into practical outcomes that affect people’s jobs, livelihoods, and communities. Ed is also a familiar voice in the Hudson Valley media landscape. He most recently served as the morning host of Hudson Valley This Morning on WKIP and is currently a frequent contributor to Hudson Valley Focus with Tom Sipos on Pamal Broadcasting. In addition, Ed is the creator of The Valley Viewpoint, a commentary and narrative platform focused on law, justice, government accountability, and the real-world impact of public policy. Across broadcast and written media, Ed’s work emphasizes transparency, access to justice, institutional integrity, and public trust. Ed is a graduate of Xavier High School, Fordham University, and Georgetown University, holding a Certificate in Business Leadership from Georgetown. His Jesuit education shaped his belief that ideas carry obligations—and that leadership requires both discipline and moral clarity. He lives in Pleasant Valley.

Leave a comment

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.